Research Finds Humans Pose Higher Risk of Extinction for Marine Mammals

Wal­ruses — Photo: © Dan Costa.

Today, many species of marine mam­mals are at risk of extinc­tion due to human activ­i­ties that have trans­formed the world’s oceans. Which marine mam­mals are at great­est risk of extinc­tion, what makes them most at risk, and where are the hotspots of at-risk species around the globe? These are among the ques­tions exam­ined by an inter­na­tional team of researchers work­ing to uncover extinc­tion processes in marine mam­mals in order to help guide global marine con­ser­va­tion efforts.

The research, titled “Dri­vers and Hotspots of Extinc­tion Risk in Marine Mam­mals” and pub­lished in the lat­est Early Edi­tion of the jour­nal Pro­ceed­ings of the National Acad­emy of Sci­ences USA, shows that almost 40 per­cent of marine mam­mals are pre­dicted to be at risk of extinction.

This find­ing is par­tic­u­larly impor­tant because cur­rently only 25 per­cent of marine mam­mals are rec­og­nized as at risk, accord­ing to Inter­na­tional Union for the Con­ser­va­tion of Nature (IUCN) Red List — the global endan­gered species list,” said lead author, Dr. Ana David­son, post­doc­toral researcher of Biol­ogy at the Uni­ver­sity of New Mex­ico and the Uni­ver­si­dad Nacional Autónoma de Méx­ico. “The con­se­quences of esca­lat­ing human impacts on marine mam­mal bio­di­ver­sity are poorly under­stood, largely because many marine mam­mals are dif­fi­cult to study due to the remote nature of their environments.”

The con­ser­va­tion sta­tus of nearly 40 per­cent of marine mam­mal species is unknown due to lack of infor­ma­tion. Using pow­er­ful pre­dic­tive mod­els to pre­dict the con­ser­va­tion sta­tus for these and other marine mam­mal species not cur­rently known to be at risk, the researchers found that 37 per­cent of marine mam­mal species are at risk of extinction.

The mod­els are impor­tant for devel­op­ing con­ser­va­tion pri­or­i­ties, and although they have been gen­er­ated for ter­res­trial mam­mals, this is the first time they have been devel­oped and uti­lized for marine mam­mals at the global scale,” said Davidson.

In addi­tion to the 32 species already on the Red List, the researchers, using their model, iden­ti­fied 15 more species as at risk. This is a con­sid­er­able num­ber given there are only 128 known species of marine mam­mals. Their model pre­dicted about one-third of all species that are cur­rently lack­ing a con­ser­va­tion sta­tus under the Red List, as at risk of extinction.

One of these is the Ama­zon River Dol­phin, who, like other river dol­phins, faces intense human pres­sures from pol­lu­tion, fish­ing and damming, includ­ing Brazil’s recently approved Belo Monte hydro­elec­tric dam, which will be the third largest in the world,” said Davidson.

The wal­rus was another species the team deter­mined to be at risk.

Wal­ruses are highly threat­ened by ocean warm­ing, which is reduc­ing sea ice used for breed­ing, feed­ing, and rest­ing, and lead­ing to increased ship­ping traf­fic, pol­lu­tion and devel­op­ment,” empha­sized Davidson.

David­son and her col­leagues found that marine mam­mal species that are most likely to be at risk of extinc­tion are those that have slow rates of reproduction.

Dr. Jim Brown, Dis­tin­guished Pro­fes­sor of Biol­ogy at UNM, said this is because the rate of repro­duc­tion reflects the, “capac­ity of a species to rebound from human impacts.”

These results sug­gest that when species with high pro­duc­tiv­i­ties fail to rebound rapidly after pro­tec­tion, the orig­i­nal envi­ron­men­tal threats have not been alle­vi­ated or new ones, such as cli­mate change, have arisen to inhibit recovery.

For exam­ple, north­ern ele­phant seals have increased expo­nen­tially after pro­tec­tion,” said Dr. Dan Costa of Uni­ver­sity of Cal­i­for­nia, Santa Cruz. “They had been reduced to 20–30 indi­vid­u­als by 1900, but increased at an esti­mated 8.3 per­cent per year to a pop­u­la­tion of ~170,000 today.”

Rel­a­tive impor­tance, in rank order, of intrin­sic and extrin­sic pre­dic­tors of marine
mam­mal extinc­tion risk. + or – indi­cates the direc­tion of cor­re­la­tion
for the con­tin­u­ous vari­ables. Draw­ings by Sharyn Davidson.

The team also found that extinc­tion risk dif­fered depend­ing on the tax­o­nomic group that species belonged to, such as man­a­tees and dugongs that have slow pro­duc­tiv­i­ties and are at par­tic­u­larly high risk. Their work shows that the inter­ac­tion of other species traits, such as small geo­graphic range area and small social group size, with extrin­sic envi­ron­men­tal vari­ables, such as degree of human impact, were impor­tant in pre­dict­ing risk.

But added David­son, “species’ traits were the most impor­tant pre­dic­tors of risk over­all, under­scor­ing the impor­tance of under­stand­ing species’ basic biolo­gies and ecolo­gies, which is unfor­tu­nately lack­ing for many marine mam­mals, even some of the most well-known groups like dolphins.”

Using their pre­dic­tive model, the team also gen­er­ated new maps of species at risk. They illus­trate that at-risk species mostly occur in coastal regions and in pro­duc­tive areas of the open ocean, which are also areas sub­ject to high lev­els of human impact. The mod­els iden­ti­fied 13 global hotspots where high num­bers of at-risk species occur, and show how they over­lap with lead­ing human impacts on the world’s oceans (fish­ing, ship­ping and pol­lu­tion, and cli­mate change) and Marine Pro­tected Areas.

We found that three-quarters of marine mam­mal species expe­ri­ence high lev­els of human impact in their envi­ron­ment, and these include the cumu­la­tive effects of numer­ous fac­tors, includ­ing fish­ing, ship­ping, pol­lu­tion, sea sur­face tem­per­a­ture change, ocean acid­i­fi­ca­tion, inva­sive species, oil rigs, and human pop­u­la­tion den­sity,” said Dr. Ali­son Boyer, a researcher from the Uni­ver­sity of Tennessee.

David­son hopes their work can help inform inter­na­tional efforts cur­rently under­way to expand Marine Pro­tected Areas through­out the globe. Cur­rently, only less than one per­cent (0.7) of the world’s oceans are protected.

New tech­nolo­gies are begin­ning to pro­vide new and bet­ter data on both the biol­ogy of marine mam­mals and the ecol­ogy of the oceans, and that such infor­ma­tion is essen­tial for con­ser­va­tion and man­age­ment to mit­i­gate the threats fac­ing many species,” said Davidson.

The researchers con­clude that because of the large mag­ni­tude and spa­tial scale of anthro­pogenic impacts and the wide ranges of many species, con­ser­va­tion of marine mam­mals will require unprece­dented global effort and polit­i­cal will.

Other researchers involved in the project include Hwah­wan Kim Uni­ver­sity of West Geor­gia, Mar­cus Hamil­ton of the Santa Fe Insti­tute and UNM, and Dr. Ger­ardo Cebal­los and Ph.D. stu­dent San­dra Pompa of UNAM.

To view the PNAS arti­cle visit: Dri­vers and Hotspots of Extinc­tion Risk in Marine Mam­mals.

Media Con­tact: Steve Carr (505) 277‑1821; email: scarr@unm.edu

Posted in Research, University News |