Researchers Find Mammals Shrink at Rates Faster Than They Grow

Large evo­lu­tion­ary changes in body size take a very long time. The min­i­mum time to evolve from mouse-sized to elephant-sized is around 24 mil­lion gen­er­a­tions, accord­ing to the work of Alis­tair Evans and UNM co-authors and Biol­ogy Pro­fes­sors Felisa Smith and James Brown.

How long did it take mam­mals the size of mice to become as large as ele­phants? Is it eas­ier to evolve larger or smaller body sizes? Research pub­lished today in the Pro­ceed­ings of the National Acad­emy of Sci­ences USA (PNAS) describes increases and decreases in mam­mal size fol­low­ing the extinc­tion of the dinosaurs 65 mil­lion years ago.

The inter­na­tional team of sci­en­tists, includ­ing sev­eral at the Uni­ver­sity of New Mex­ico, found that it took about 24 mil­lion gen­er­a­tions for ter­res­trial mam­mals to evolve from the size of a mouse to that of an ele­phant after the dinosaurs went extinct.

Get­ting smaller is eas­ier: once large size was achieved, it only took about one hun­dred thou­sand gen­er­a­tions for very large decreases, such as extreme dwarfism, to occur.

Our work demon­strates, for the first time, how quickly the major changes in body size have hap­pened in the his­tory of mam­mals,” says Alis­tair Evans, an evo­lu­tion­ary biol­o­gist at Monash Uni­ver­sity in Mel­bourne, Aus­tralia who was the lead author on the paper.

The research team looked at 28 dif­fer­ent groups of mam­mals from the four largest con­ti­nents (Africa, Eura­sia, and North and South Amer­ica) and all ocean basins dur­ing the last 70 mil­lion years. These groups included ele­phants, rhi­nos, hip­pos, car­ni­vores and whales.

In ear­lier work we looked at the over­all body size tra­jec­tory and con­straints oper­at­ing on body size,” said Felisa Smith, a co-author and pale­oe­col­o­gist at the Uni­ver­sity of New Mex­ico. “Here instead of chrono­log­i­cal time, we use gen­er­a­tions. This allowed us to com­pare the rates of change among very small and large mam­mals and ask whether it mat­ters if you are get­ting big­ger or smaller. It turns out it does.”

Trans­for­ma­tions can hap­pen much faster in ani­mals that live in the water: an increase from rabbit-sized to elephant-sized would take at least 5 mil­lion gen­er­a­tions, but the equiv­a­lent change in whales takes half as many generations.

Researchers were sur­prised to learn how quickly body size decreased: the rate is more than 10 times faster than the increases.

The appar­ently dif­fer­ent rates of dwarf­ing and gigan­tism are rel­e­vant to under­stand­ing the evo­lu­tion of body size of domes­tic ani­mals under arti­fi­cial selec­tion,” said Jim Brown, a co-author also at the Uni­ver­sity of New Mex­ico. “Both dogs and horses exhibit much greater decreases than increases in size, and prob­lems asso­ci­ated with large size in dogs (such as hip dis­pla­sia, reduced life expectancy. etc.) are not seen — or at least nowhere near so severe — in small dogs.”

The work was funded by a research coor­di­na­tion grant from the National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion to Smith and two col­leagues: Kate Lyons at the Smith­son­ian and Mor­gan Ernest at Utah State Uni­ver­sity. “With­out sup­port from NSF, this work could never have hap­pened” said Smith. “It took us years and a core group of 10 sci­en­tists to assem­ble the data we needed to address this question.”

This research will help sci­en­tists to bet­ter under­stand mam­mal evo­lu­tion: what con­di­tions allow mam­mals to grow to big­ger sizes and when smaller size is favored.

To read the com­plete paper, visit: The max­i­mum rate of mam­mal evo­lu­tion.

Media Con­tact: Steve Carr (505) 277‑1821; email: scarr@unm.edu

Posted in Research, University News |